Quote Originally Posted by ImSavy View Post
Fold. If I was to play with villain a lot, make note of how often he was raising here and adjust accordingly


What does checking achieve? On a wet board like this with TP when you're going to call a decent sized bet anyway you may aswell bet yourself.

Checking and your opponent bets tells us nothing as he could be having a stab at taking down a wet board with nothing as it's checked to him or he could have a real hand.

Checking and your opponent checking also tells us nothing, and it allows him to see a free card which as the board is so wet makes us hate our hand more.

At least if you bet and get called you know he'll have thrown away a lot of the rubbish in his hand making it an easier fold on a later street and if you get raised you can be pretty certain you're behind and fold.
If I check, I can't be raised. At the time of the hand, I wasn't sure what I would do if raised, now I know I should fold but at the time I didn't know that.

If opponent checks behind on flop, I can be pretty sure I have the best hand and have managed to keep the pot small with a marginal hand.

Quote Originally Posted by Icanhastreebet View Post
1 and 3, you make it sound like you want to bet for information. This isn't why we are betting. Refer back to the reasons I listed

2. When opponent checks behind on a flop texture like this it narrows his range drastically since he suddenly doesn't have the top 25-30%(random estimate) of his flopping range now.
Is there something wrong with doing this?